Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
DIGITAL CONVERGENCE REVISITED
  • Keynote Address at the
    2005 Teaching, Learning & Technology Fair
    Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
  • Presented by Tom Peters
    March 3, 2005
2
The Question
  •   How should the university library promote the use of information and learning technologies
    throughout the university?
3
Why This Question?
(What is the Problem?)
  • Lippincott (2005) notes an  apparent disconnect between library culture and the culture of Net Gen students
  • Traits of Net Gen Students:
    • Accustomed to multimedia environments
    • Learn as you go; don’t consult manuals
    • Work in small groups
    • Multitasking is common
4
Top-Down, Device-Driven Answers
  • U. of S. Dakota (http://www.usd.edu/pda/)
    requires Palm OS PDAs.
  • Duke U. (http://www.duke.edu/ipod/)
    requires students to purchase an iPod.
  • If you put devices in the hands of users,
    the technology will become institutionalized.
  • Does this ignore the personal and personalization strengths of these devices?
  • Does this solve the problem of the plethora of devices and competing designs on the market?
5
Four Immediate Hurdles
  • Libraries should not promote anything.
  • The “Life of the Mind” and technology do not mix well.  IT is a distraction.
  • Not the library’s problem.  Some other campus unit should tackle this problem.
  • National and international initiatives will solve this problem.  Local efforts are basically a waste of time and resources.
6
Convergence Revisited
  • Convergence of modes of learning (classroom, lab, library, residence hall, etc.)
  • Using the library can occur anywhere, anytime
  • Convergence of virtual reality and “real” reality
  • Convergence of campus-wide information systems
  • Divergence of texts and text-bearing devices
  • “Power shift” from the author to the reader
7
Persistent Pedagogical Problems
  • Info seeking is a natural behavior
  • Many members of the teaching faculty are reluctant to devote time to Info Literacy
  • Student motivation to hone Info Literacy skills is very time sensitive
  • Usage of personal, portable information/communication appliances will increase on campus
  • No convergence in the appliance market
8
Potential Library Roles
  • Focus on “last mile” issues
  • Continue to provide in-library labs, commons, collaboratories, etc.
  • Continue to explore and assert the value of high quality metadata.
  • Point-of-need (point-of-use) instruction
9
Potential Roles (cont.)
  • Develop a more collaborative, collegial relationship with digital content suppliers
  • Know thy users
  • Gather, organize, deliver, and archive compelling content
  • Users seek information in order to create information.  Help them to both seek and create information.
10
Tentative Conclusions
and Recommendations
  • Deliver content and info services to the device level.
  • Collaborate closely with other campus units (and other universities).
  • Know (and differentiate among) the needs of various campus groups.
  • Integrate library collections and services into the core university activities.
11
Tentative Conclusions and Recommendations (cont.)
  • Technology eventually becomes old hat and recedes from consciousness, while content and services abide.
  • Lean and mean information literacy efforts.  Diversify and modularize.
  • Increasing demand for assessments of the quality of information resources?
12
Conclusion: Back to the Question
  •   How should the university library promote the use of information and learning technologies throughout the university?
13
Background Reading
  • Flecker, Dale and Neil McLean. 2004.  "Digital Library Content and Course Management Systems: Issues of Interoperation" Report of a Study Group. Digital Library Federation (July 2004), http://www.diglib.org/pubs/cmsdl0407/cmsdl0407.htm.
  • Lippincott, Joan.  2005.  “Net Generation Students and Libraries.”  In Educating the Net Generation, edited by Diana G. Oblinger and James L. Oblinger.  EDUCAUSE.   http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7101m.pdf
  • Reeb, Brenda, and Susan Gibbons.  2004.  “Students, Librarians, and Subject Guides:  Improving a Poor Rate of Return.”  Portal: Librarians and the Academy 4 (1).  Available online in HTML and PDF formats at http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/portal_libraries_and_the_academy/toc/pla4.1.html (requires a subscription to Project Muse).
  • Sakai Project  http://www.sakaiproject.org/
    • See also Suzanne Thorin’s brief update in the Feb. 2005 issue of D-Lib Magazine (http://www.dlib.org/dlib/february05/02inbrief.html#THORIN)
14
Questions and Discussion
  • Tom Peters
    TAP Information Services
  • Email:   tpeters@tapinformation.com
  • Phone:  816.228.6406
    Website:  www.tapinformation.com